找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Austerity vs Stimulus; The Political Future Robert Skidelsky,Nicolò Fraccaroli Book 2017 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 20

[复制链接]
查看: 24543|回复: 57
发表于 2025-3-21 16:25:14 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
期刊全称Austerity vs Stimulus
期刊简称The Political Future
影响因子2023Robert Skidelsky,Nicolò Fraccaroli
视频video
发行地址Presents contemporary views on austerity v stimulus from the world‘s leading economic figures in one collection.Provides readers with the tools necessary to engage in the debate.Concludes with an outl
图书封面Titlebook: Austerity vs Stimulus; The Political Future Robert Skidelsky,Nicolò Fraccaroli Book 2017 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 20
影响因子This timely book debates the economic and political logic of the austerity policies that have been implemented in the UK and in the Eurozone since 2010 and asks whether there is any alternative for these countries in the years ahead. The work reconsiders the austerity versus stimulus debate through the voices of those who proposed the successful idea of expansionary austerity and those who opposed it. The editors have brought together a collection of articles written by some of the most notable figures in the discipline, including the likes of Alberto Alesina, Ken Rogoff, Tim Besley, David Graeber, Vince Cable, and Paul Krugman. The book also features the debate between Niall Ferguson and Robert Skidelsky. These leading thinkers unveil a world where economists are far from agreeing on economic policy, and where politics often dominates the discussion. The question of whether the British government should have opted for austerity runs through the book, as well as how sustained economicrecovery should be encouraged in the future. Scholars, students and members of the general public with an interest in the financial crisis and its lingering aftermath will find this work invaluable.
Pindex Book 2017
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Austerity vs Stimulus影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Austerity vs Stimulus影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Austerity vs Stimulus网络公开度




书目名称Austerity vs Stimulus网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Austerity vs Stimulus被引频次




书目名称Austerity vs Stimulus被引频次学科排名




书目名称Austerity vs Stimulus年度引用




书目名称Austerity vs Stimulus年度引用学科排名




书目名称Austerity vs Stimulus读者反馈




书目名称Austerity vs Stimulus读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 1 人参与投票
 

1票 100.00%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0.00%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0.00%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0.00%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0.00%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 20:55:34 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 01:04:01 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 05:13:34 | 显示全部楼层
Austerity: A Solution to Restore Markets’ Confidencely be focusing on is the budget-tightening’s composition (tax versus spending) and on the accompanying policies. Indeed, […] “Has austerity gone too far?” reflects this inappropriate emphasis on size. In our view, the essential question is not “how far” governments go but of “how” they go far enough.
发表于 2025-3-22 08:59:03 | 显示全部楼层
Confidence Beyond Debt: The Role of Monetary Policys thus logical to judge the central bank’s actions first and foremost according to this parameter (as narrow as it may be), especially since one of the stated aims of the ECB’s QE program is to bring the inflation rate back towards the 2% target.
发表于 2025-3-22 13:29:36 | 显示全部楼层
,What Does It Mean “Metal Cutting”?,borators’ work in defining and defending the modern policy case for austerity cannot be overestimated” as reported by Blyth (Austerity: The history of a dangerous idea, Oxford University Press, Oxford, ., p. 167).
发表于 2025-3-22 19:27:15 | 显示全部楼层
,What Does It Mean “Metal Cutting”?,e ruling government and most of the media still support the austerity ideology. Through an inquiry into the history of austerity in its economic and political dimension, Krugman explains how we got to where we are.
发表于 2025-3-22 22:02:56 | 显示全部楼层
Erik M. Alfsen,Frederic W. Shultzly be focusing on is the budget-tightening’s composition (tax versus spending) and on the accompanying policies. Indeed, […] “Has austerity gone too far?” reflects this inappropriate emphasis on size. In our view, the essential question is not “how far” governments go but of “how” they go far enough.
发表于 2025-3-23 03:06:52 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 08:42:11 | 显示全部楼层
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-9 21:35
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表